Order of operations: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
\( 8 \div 2(1+3) = 16 \) or \( 1 \) | \( 8 \div 2(1+3) = 16 \) or \( 1 \) | ||
Some people think that the presence or omission of a multiplication symbol in the above expression is important: [[Missing multiplication symbol|implicit multiplication]] might bind more tightly than the division symbol. | |||
Several ways of resolving the ambiguity have been suggested, but all the ones [[User:Christian Lawson-Perfect | I've]] seen introduce other problems. | |||
==Suggested resolutions== | |||
'''Reverse Polish Notation''': The expression \((x-2)(x-1)\) would be written instead \(\times \, - \, x \, 2 \, - \, x \, 1\), or something like that. There's no need for brackets or operator precedence, but it is hard to see at a glance what each operator applies to. | |||
'''Add brackets''': around everything?? | |||
'''Make up a new rule''': At MathsJam Gathering 2020, Christian Lawson-Perfect suggested adding a rule "M before D except after 3". So \(6 \div 2 \times 3 = 1\), but \(3 \div 2 \times 4 = 6\). | |||
==References== | |||
Christian Lawson-Perfect has made a tool called [https://www.checkmyworking.com/misc/samdob/ SAMDOB] which lets you make up your own mnemonic and see how an expression is evaluated. | |||
Colin Beveridge dubbed viral "puzzles" related to misunderstanding the order of operations [https://www.flyingcoloursmaths.co.uk/new-years-resolution-genius-sic/ fake maths]. | |||
Adam Townsend and Matthew Scroggs proposed using [https://chalkdustmagazine.com/blog/medusa-new-bodmas/ MEDUSA] instead of BODMAS to reduce ambiguities caused by division being done before multiplication or subtraction being doing before addition. | |||
Kyle D. Evans' book, [https://atlantic-books.co.uk/book/maths-tricks-to-blow-your-mind/ Maths Tricks to Blow Your Mind], collects many examples of viral order of operations problems in Chapter 4. | |||
[[Category:Ambiguities]] | |||
Latest revision as of 11:49, 16 September 2021
There are quite a few mnemonics for the order of operations. A common one in the UK is BODMAS:
- Brackets
- Orders
- Division
- Multiplication
- Addition
- Subtraction
Elsewhere, PEMDAS is popular.
But division and multiplication have equal precedence, and so do addition and subtraction. A common convention is that operations with equal precedence are evaluated from left to right.
This leads to all sorts of misunderstandings.
\( 8 \div 2(1+3) = 16 \) or \( 1 \)
Some people think that the presence or omission of a multiplication symbol in the above expression is important: implicit multiplication might bind more tightly than the division symbol.
Several ways of resolving the ambiguity have been suggested, but all the ones I've seen introduce other problems.
Suggested resolutions
Reverse Polish Notation: The expression \((x-2)(x-1)\) would be written instead \(\times \, - \, x \, 2 \, - \, x \, 1\), or something like that. There's no need for brackets or operator precedence, but it is hard to see at a glance what each operator applies to.
Add brackets: around everything??
Make up a new rule: At MathsJam Gathering 2020, Christian Lawson-Perfect suggested adding a rule "M before D except after 3". So \(6 \div 2 \times 3 = 1\), but \(3 \div 2 \times 4 = 6\).
References
Christian Lawson-Perfect has made a tool called SAMDOB which lets you make up your own mnemonic and see how an expression is evaluated.
Colin Beveridge dubbed viral "puzzles" related to misunderstanding the order of operations fake maths.
Adam Townsend and Matthew Scroggs proposed using MEDUSA instead of BODMAS to reduce ambiguities caused by division being done before multiplication or subtraction being doing before addition.
Kyle D. Evans' book, Maths Tricks to Blow Your Mind, collects many examples of viral order of operations problems in Chapter 4.
